A Historical Overview of Ethnobotanical Literature of Chhattisgarh [India]: A Graphic Review and Future Directions

 

Amia Ekka

School of Life Sciences, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur (C.G.), India 492010

 

 

ABSTRACT:

This review of ethnobotany of Chhattisgarh state, literature covers approximately the period 1902-2005. During this period about 315 publications have appeared on ethnobotany of C.G. and closely bordering topics. Papers have been published in about 50 journals in India and abroad. Some 110 persons have been writing on ethnobotanical themes; most of these are plant taxonomists. Work has been published on over 16 ethnic groups. Only three or four ethnic groups have been the subject of more than five publications. Only two districts Bastar and Surguja have been well covered. Rest of the districts have been small work or no worked done. Ethnomedicine for over 12 diseases, ailments and injuries figure in titles of papers. Based on this analysis, certain themes and areas are suggested for more intensive work.

 

KEYWORDS: Gaps in Ethnobotany; Ethnomedicine; Ethnic groups; Future directions

 

 

INTRODUCTION:

The sea-horse shaped Chhattisgarh state come into existence on 1st November 2000 by the Bill “Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act. 2000” passed in the parliament. Until then it was a part of Madhya Pradesh state. It is situated between 17046’ to 24005’ North latitude and 80015’ to 84026’ east longitude. It measures 360  kms from North to South and 140 kms, from West to East, comprising an area about 135194 sq. kms, which is about 4.14% of India’s total land area and 30% of its parent state “Madhya Pradesh”. The southeastern districts of Madhya Pradesh, viz. Bastar, Bilaspur, Dantewara, Dhamtari, Durg, Janjgir-Champa, Jashpur, Kanker, Kawardha, Korba, Koria, Mahasamund, Rajnandgaon, Raigarh, Raipur, Sarguja etc. from Chhattisgarh. This state is surrounded by Orissa and Jharkhand on the East, Uttar Pradesh on the North, Madhya Pradesh and Maharastra, on the West and Andra Pradesh on the South. Geographically a large part of Chhattisgarh lies in the valley of rivers Mahanadi and Sheonath. The eastern part lies on the Chhota-Nagpur plateau and the southern part in the Deccan plateau. Chhattisgarh is abundantly endowed with natural resources. Its dense forest cover occupies about 41.42 percent of the area of the state with a number of wild life sanctuaries populated by tigers, leopards, bears, bisons, hyenas, wild bears etc.

 

The state is rich for different tribes. According to the Census of 1991, the Scheduled Caste people constitute about 12.19% of the total population and scheduled tribes are about 32.46%, it is four times more than that of national figure (8%). In other words it can be said that nearly every third person in the state is a tribe. The life style of tribal people depends upon the land. Agriculture, hunting, fishing, collection of forest products, bamboo work or labour of any kind is their livelihood.


Scheduled Caste viz. Chikwa, Ghasi, Mahar, Chamar, Mehtar and Scheduled tribes are –Oraon, Agria, Bhil, Gond, Bhungia, Bharia, Kol, Khairwar, Korwa, Manjhi, Muria, Saharia etc.

 

Ethnobotany, as an organised discipline of study in India, is rather young, just about five decades old. The first bibliography of ethnobotany in India was published in the early eightes (Jain et al.1984). Most of the publications in the three decades of the fifties, sixties and seventies. This was natural, as the subject was just getting known, attracting more and more young field botanists and others to “extend” their simple plant collection and floristic or ethnographic work to closer enquiries and record of indigenous uses of plants.

 

Since the eighties, however, emphasis has been laid on more specific work on particular classes of indigenous uses, like plants in food, medicine, other material culture and even faith tradition selected to conservation of bioresources and on particular diseases or ethnic groups.

 

A recent detailed bibliographic work on Indian ethnobotany (Jain 2002) has brought out certain facts and also trends in research. The following analysis covers approximately the period 1902-2005. First book published was one century year ago by wood (1902) on plants of Chota-nagpur including Jashpur and Surguja.

 

Analysis of papers:

These all 315 references listed in a recent “Bibliography of Ethnobotany of C.G. state” (Minor research project submitted to IOE, Gwalior by Tirkey 2005). These references are relate strictly to ethnobotanical work or very closely allied themes on Chhattisgarh.

 

(A) Ethnic groups:

Over 59, papers relate to specific ethnic groups. Studies on the different aspects of Oraons (Sahu 1980, Sen 1965, Tirkey 1992, Das 1959, Danda 1977, Roy 1915,1928,2004) Baiga, Gond and Sahariya of central India (Brij Lal 1993, Elwin 1958, Jain 1965, Grigson 1949, Jain A.K. 1990), Bhils (Koppers et al 1948, Ranade 1956, Shrivastava 1985), Munda, Nagas, Korwa, Khairwar (Basu 1932-33, Jamir 1990, Baghel 1981, Bajpai 1997, Lakra 1997), Maria, Pahariya and Kharia (Elwin 1943, 1947, Sahay 1966, Roy et al 1937) and the Abujhmaria and Bharia (Maheshwari 1989, 1985) have resulted in many publication. (Fig –1)

 

(B) Ethnomedicobotany:

Though a very little publication of papers on ethnomedicobotany deal with some diseases for which cures were reported to authors of those papers. Only 12 kinds of ailments and injuries have been studied by 16 papers (Tirkey et.al. 2004, 2000, Jain 1987, Brij 1988) on some topical themes like Indigestion, Dysentery, Jaundice, Bone fracture, Rheumatism, Ethnoveterinary, snake bite, skin disease and Hair problems. (Fig- 2)

 


 

(C) Regional coverage:

The districts / regions in Chhattisgarh on which 65 or more publications have appeared are shown in Fig 3. This analysis is based on the name of district / tehsils appearing in title and can be only approximate, because many papers mention names of India and its parent state M.P.

 

A number of papers deal with dozens of families and some plant species of ethnobotanical significance in any area. About 9 papers deal with only one or two particular species in detail. Few plants like Mahua (Roy et. al. 1959), Polypleurum dichotomum (Roy et. al. 1986), Water bottle (Jain 1964), Bauhinia vahlii (Jain et al 1973), Nyctanthus arbor – tristis (Jain et al 1964), and Elephantopus scaber (Kumar et al 2002) have been the subject of only one title.

28 families of flowering plants namely: Asteraceae, Mimosaceae, Aizoaceae, Molluginaceae, Malvaceae Oleaceae, Burseraceae, Passifloraceae, Fabaceae, Leguminaceae, Ulmaceae, Moraceae, Opiliaceae, Elacegnaceae, Verbenaceae, Araliaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Polygonaceae, Cyperaceae, Commilinaceae , Orchidaceae, Ebenaceae, Convolvulaceae, Hydrocharitaceae, Eriocaulaceae, Rosaceae, Rubiaceae, Bignoniaceae have known medicinal plants of Chhattisgarh.

 

Fortunately, it is not only the Angiosperms which have attracted ethnobotanists, other groups of plants have also received attention of ethnobotanists, e.g. Brij Lal et al (1995,1985) on Lichenes. Lal and Anand (1998) on Pteridophytes and Rai et al (1992) on Fungus.

 

Untrodden paths’?

A few interesting publications describe the journeys of their authors into ‘untrodden paths’, like Magico-religious beliefs about plants (Banerjee 1974), A note on bidi leaf (Das et al 1963), Plants used as fish Poison (Kumar et al 2003), Ghirra mahotsav (Goel 1990), Musical instruments (Elwin 1955,a,b), Ranu- A tribal tablet (Chaudhuri et. al. 1977), Cottage industries (Jain 1995, Brij lal et. al. 1993), Observations on some energy plants (Singh et.al.1999) Food plants (Jain et.al.1990,1988, Rai 1925, Kumar 2003) short note on tribal folk (Chattopadhyaya 1954) and Toys of tribal children (Elwin 1953).

 

Workers and journals:

All 315 references shows that about 110 persons, mostly botanists and usually taxonomists, have been bublishing on ethnobotany in C.G. Published papers have appeared in over one hundred periodicals. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany and Ethnobotany have published over 100 papers each during the period under review; other notable journals in this respect are Economic Botany, Ancient science of life, Bulletin of Botanical Survey of India, Bulletin of Medicoethnobotanical Research, and Journal of Ethnopharmacology.

 

Gaps  in work and future directions:

Finally, the analysis brings out certain lacunae and possible directions for future work.

On the basis of literature Bastar district and Surguja districts are particularly rich in plant diversity, including land races and wild relatives of crop plants. They are also home of varied ethnic groups. Yet, studies on these hilly regions have not been adequate; e.g. there are only about a dozen papers. Very little work has been done on district like Raigarh, Jashpur, Durg, Rajnandgaon, Raipur and Bilaspur. Rest of 8 districts have been not touched.

 

Many important aspects of ethnobotany on which botanists, anthropologists, agriculture scientists, geographers and other naturalists are working and pubishing in other parts of the India, are hardly being studied in Chhattisgarh. Some such topics or themes are also mentioned below :

1.      The impact of use of one or few specific plants for food, medicine, music, dyes, gums, house-building or other needs and trade on the population of these species or on biodiversity and ecosystem of the region;

2.      The impact of faith and taboos associated with certain plants or sacred groves on conservation of those species and on the ecosystem and other conservation practices of the folk;

3.      The concept of the folk about taxonomy of various kinds of plants of their surroundings, e.g. any notable system of classification into small or large groups, comparable in any manner with botanical families, genera or other taxa, and any expression of such knowledge in local names of plants;

4.      Any discernible gender, age, occupation or other demarcations among the folk relating to knowledge about plants of their vicinity;

5.      Tribal arts like painting, tatooing and artifacts; many of the latter can be developed in to cottage industries for souvenies, etc and bring socio-economic benefits.

6.      More tribe and plant specific studies.

 

Alcorn (1995) studied the writings of several ethnobotanists in developing countries relating specially to problems of socioeconomic development. She laid emphasis on the question : What good is this plant? If this question can become the focus of field workers, the interviews, the data, and the intreprectations of ethnobotanical researches can become still more meaningful.

 

The planners do need data on such natural wealth of a region, which can become an economic resource, directly or after some improvement and processing.

 

Of particular interest and use in this respect should be critical studies and the way the local folk attempt to manage them.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:

The Author thanks are due to the HOD, School of life Sciences, Pt. R.S.U., Raipur for facilities provided. She expresses her thanks to Dr. S.K. Jain for his cooperation, moral support, inspiration, affection and timely encouragement. She expresses her sincere thanks to the Director NBRI, Lucknow for providing their kind help and library staff, Finally, gratefully express her sincere thanks to Dr. Asok Jain, Hon. Director, IOE, Jiwaji University, Gwalior for financial support.

 

REFERENCES:

1.       Allcorn, J.B.(1995)The Scope and aim of Ethnobotany, In developing world p-23-29 in Schultes, R.E. and S.V. Reis. Ethnobotany, Evolution of a Discipline. Dioscorides press, Portland.

2.       Baghel, D.S. (1981) The Karma Dance of Korwas. Vanyajati 29 (4) : 26-31

3.       Bajpai, H.R. and Mishra, M. (1997) Problem and prospective of primitive hill Korwa tribe. Vanyajati 45 (1) : 2-4

4.       Banerjee, D.K. (1974) Magico – religious beliefs about plants among some Adibasis of India. J. Mythic. Soc. 65 (3) : 5-8

5.       Basu, P.G. (1932-33) The Racial affinities of the Mundas and Transactions of the Basu. Research Institute 8:211-247

6.       Brij, Lal (1988) Traditional remedies for bone fracture among the tribals of Madhya  Pradesh, India. Aryavaidyan 1(3) : 190-195

7.       Brij, Lal (1993) Ethnobotany of Baigas of Madhya Pradesh –a preliminary report. Arunachal forest news 11(1) : 17-20

8.       Brij, Lal And Maheshwari, J.K. (1993) Prospects of plant – Based cottage industries in tribal areas of Madhya Pradesh. J.Eco.Tax.Bot. 17(1) : 235-238

9.       Brij, Lal, Upreti, D.K. (1995) Ethnobotanical notes on three Indian Lichens. Lichenologist 21(1) : 77-79

10.     Brij, Lal., Upreti, D.K. and Kalakoti, B.S. (1985) Ethnobotnical utilization of Lichens by the tribals of Madhya Pradesh (India). J.Eco.Tax.Bot. 7:203-204.

11.     Chattopadhyaya, K.P. (1954) A short note on cultivation among tribal folk in India. Vanyajati 2(4) : 110-112

12.     Chaudhuri, Rai, H.N., Banerjee, D.K. and Guha, A.(1977) “Ranu” – A tribal tablet. Vanyajati 25:9-13

13.     Danda, A.K. (1977) Tribal situation in North east Surguja. Anthropological Survey of India, Calcutta.

14.     Das, A.K. (1959) Food habits and dietaries of the Oraons and their nutritional efficiency. Vanyajati 7:53-58.

15.     Das, A.K., Sarkar, B.K. (1963) A note on bidi leaf (Diospyros melanoxylon) India for. 89:39-45

16.     Elwin, V. (1943) Maria Murder and suicide. Bombay (2nd Edn. 1950)

17.     Elwin, V. (1947) Maria and their Ghotul. Oxford Uni. Press, London.

18.     Elwin, V. (1953) Toys of tribal children. Illustrated Weekly of India. Oct. 18,74 (42) : 28-29.

19.     Elwin, V. (1955) The musical instruments of tribal India. (ii) Illustrated Weekly of India, Nov. 27, 76(48) : 26-27

20.     Elwin, V. (1955) The musical instruments of tribal India. (ii) Illustrated Weekly of India, Dec. 4, 76(49) : 48-49

21.     Goel, M.R. (1990) Chhattisgarh ke surguja ke Aadivasiyon ka MahotsavGhirraVanyajati 38(4) : 5-7

22.     Grigson, W.(1949) The Maria Gonds of Bastar. Oxford university Press. London.

23.     Jain, A.K. (1995) Prospects of plantlore of Sahariya Tribe in the development of  Cottage industries. Vanyajati 3:11-14

24.     Jain, A.K., Sharma, H.O. (1990) Certain medicinal plants used by Sahariya tribals of northern M.P.Proc. Nat. Sem.Med. and Arm. Plants. Jabalpur. 2:155-165

25.     Jain, S.K. (1964) An indigenous water bottle . Indian forester 90-709

26.     Jain, S.K. (1965) Wooden musical instruments of the Gonds of Central India. Ethnomusicology 9(1) : 39-42

27.     Jain, S.K. (1987) Plants in Indian medicine and folklore associated with       healing  of bones. Indian J. Orthopaed. 1: 95-104

28.     Jain, S.K. (2002) Bibliography of Indian Ethnobotany . Scientific Publisher, Jodhpur (India)

29.     Jain, S.K., Hanif, M.I. and Tarafder, C.R. (1973) Bauhinia vahlii – A                            multipurpose plant in tribal area. Vanyajati 21(4) : 106-108

30.     Jain, S.K., Mudgal, V., Banerjee, D.K., Guha,A., Pal,D.C. AND Das, D. (1984) Bibliography of Ethnobotany B.S.I. Calcutta.

31.     Jain, S.K., Sinha, B.K. Gupta, R.C. (1991) Notable plants in Ethnomedicine of India pp. 1-219 Deep publ. New Delhi.

32.     Jain, S.K., Sinha, B.K., Saklani, A. (1990) Some lesser known food plants among oboriginals in India. In : Posey, D., Overal, W.L. (eds) Ethnobiology Impliations and Applications, Goeldi Mus. Nat. Hist. Belem. Brazil.

33.     Jain, S.K., and Tarafder (1964) Observations on Nyctanthes arbor-tristis L.J. SOC. Indian For. 4:97-101

34.     Jamir, N.S. (1990) Some interesting medicinal plants used by Nagas. Journal of  Research and Education in Indian medicine. 9(2) : 81-87

35.     Koppers, W.and Jungblut, L. (1948) Betrothal rites among the Bhils of north western Central India. Art. Asiac. 9:5-33.

36.     Kumar, Vivek (2003) Wild edible plants of Surguja District of Chhattisgarh State, India. J.Eco.Tax.Bot. 27(2) : 272-282

37.     Kumar, V.and rao, R.R. (2002) Elephantopus scaber L. An important  medicinal plant used by tribals of Surguja. Tropical medicinal Plant, Malaysia 3(2) : 219-221

38.     Kumar, V.and Sikarwar, R.L.S. (2003) Plants used as fish poison by tribals of Surguja district in Chhattisgarh State, India. Ethnobotany 15:87-89

39.     Lakra, I. (1997) Health status of women of Khairwar tribe of Surguja District. Bulletin of the tribal research Institute, Bhopal XXV (2) : 43-47

40.     Lal, Jagdish and Kumar, Anand (1998) List of tax a of Pteridophytes not included in the flora of Madhya pradesh. Volume I.J.Eco.Tax.Bot. 22(3):657-660

41.     Maheshwari (1989) Case studies of three primitive tirbes (Abujhmarhia, Baiga         and Bharia) of Central India. In Methods and Approaches in Ethnobotany                   (ed. S.K. Jain) pp. 187-188 SOE, Lucknow

42.     Maheshwari, J.K. and Dwivedi R.P. (1985) Ethnobotany of Abujhmarhia tribe of Bastar district, M.P.I  J.Indian bot.Soc. Abstracts Vol.64 supplement, P-53

43.     Rai, B.K. Rai, A. (1992) Use of fungus in folk medicine for family planning among Baiga, Folklore 33:65

44.     Rai, Bahadur, H. (1925) Some notes about marriage, food, drink and occupations of castes affecting Social Status in Central Provinces. Man in India. 5 (1and2) : 56-68.

45.     Ranade, R. M. (1956) Oil Pressingas home industry among Bhils and Bailalas. Vanyajati 4 (1) : 40 - 41.

46.     Roy, G. P. and Dixit, S. K. (1986) Polypleurum dichotomum (Gardn.) J. B. Hall (Podostamaceae) - A new record for central India. Indian J. for 9(1):      87 - 89.

47.     Roy, J. K. Rao, R. K. and Roy, B. C. (1959) Mahua Spirit and the chemical               composition of the raw material (Mahua flowers) J. Inst. Chem.  31 : 64.

48.     Roy, S. C. (1915) The Oraon of Chotanagpur,  Calcutta. The Brahmo mission press.

49.     Roy, S. C. (1928) Oraon religion and customs.  The Industry Press. Ranchi.

50.     Roy, S. C. (2004) The Oraons of Chotanagpur. Crown Publications, Ranchi.

51.     Roy, S. C., Roy, R. C. (1937) The Kharias. Man in India, Ranchi.

52.     Sahay, B. N. 1966 Pahariyas and their customs. Ibid 14 (1) : 7 - 18.

53.     Sen, Gupta, A. K. (1965)  Economic organisation of an oraon village. Vanyajati 13 (2) : 41 - 45.

54.     Shrivastava, R. K. (1985) Herbal remedies used by the Bhils of Madhya Pradesh. Oriental Med. Kyoto, Japan 389 - 395.

55.     Singh, K. K., Anand Prakash, and Polvi, S. K. (1999) Observations on some Energy plants Among the tribals of Madhya Pradesh. J. Econ. tax. Bot. 23 (2) : 291 - 296.

56.     Tirkey, Amia (2002) Ethnomedicinal investigation on plants of Dist. Raigarh (M. P.) Ph. D thesis submitted to Barkatullah University, Bhopal (Unpublished)

57.     Tirkey, Amia, Khan, F. and Khan S. S. (Ed.) (2000) Medicinal plants used in the treatment of hair in Raigarh District of Madhya Pradesh ( India) Vistas in Ethnobotany 1 : 104 - 110.

58.     Tirkey, Amia, Khan, S. S. and Khan, F. (2004) Ethnomedicinally Important plants   used in the treatement of skin afflictions by the tribals of Chhattisgarh. In Ethnomedicine and Human welfare 3:68 - 90

59.     Tirkey, Amia (2005) – “Bibliography of Ethnobotany of Chhattisgarh State” India. Project report submitted to IOE, Gwalior (M.P.)

60.     Tirkey, Boniface (1992) The smiling Uraon. Navjyoti Niketan, Patna.

61.     Verma, R. (1989) Madhya Pradesh District Gazetters Surguja. Directorate of Gazetters, Dept. of Culture, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

62.     Wood, J. J. (1902) Plants of Chhota Nagpur including Jashpur and Surguja. Rec. Bot. Surv. India  2 (1) : 1 - 170.

 

Received on 25.06.2011

Modified on 14.07.2011

Accepted on 10.08.2011           

© A&V Publication all right reserved

Research J. Science and Tech.  3(4): July-August. 2011: 220-224